RE: DOCTYPE Question

by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>

Date:	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 15:13:20 -0400
To:	"Ted Temer" <temer(at)c-zone.net>, "HWGBASICS" <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
In-Reply-To:	localhost
	todo: View Thread, Original

Dang.

TWO old timers learning something in the same day !!


Fuzzy
<grinning widely>




At 10:31 AM 9/29/00 -0700, Ted Temer wrote:
[ . . .]
>Ahh- at last--someone with an actual REASON to use a DOCTYPE statement. It
>does make sense that if one is going to use XHTML that it might be of some
>value to tell the browsers. And what better place than in a DOCTYPE.
>Granted, this only covers XHTML and not necessarily plain old HTML but it's
>a start. Thanks for the info. This is something we can ALL use.
[ . . .]
__________________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION.  It comes bundled with the software.
------------------------------------------------------------------

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA