Re[2]: HTML VALIDATION (?) PROGRAMS/SITES

by Christopher Higgs <c.higgs(at)landfood.unimelb.edu.au>

 Date:  Sun, 27 Feb 2000 15:47:32 +1100
 To:  Dick <r.schweiss(at)worldnet.att.net>,
HTML GUILD <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
 In-Reply-To:  cvnulame
  todo: View Thread, Original
At 18:33 26/02/00 -0800, Dick wrote:
>I used the "WEBLINT PEDANTIC" with Microshaft .. err  soft .... settings for
>all evaluations.

WebLint is designed to pick up useless code, not incorrect code.  This 
seems contradictory, but look at the following example:

<P><.FONT FACE="Arial"><FONT><.FONT FACE="Courier"><FONT><.FONT 
FACE="Times"><FONT>Hello<.FONT FACE="Arial"><FONT></P>

Does exactly the same, in a fewer number of bytes, as:

<P>Hello</P>

Both snippets of code validate, but one contains a lot of extra useless 
information - or lint.  WYSIWYG editors such as MS Word are notorious for 
adding a multitude of such useless garbage.


Chris Higgs <c.higgs(at)landfood.unimelb.edu.au>
Institute of Land and Food Resources
University of Melbourne http://www.landfood.unimelb.edu.au

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA