Re: CSS in IE 6
by "Keith D Sellars" <Keith(at)webgraffix.com>
|
| Date: |
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 21:59:55 -0500 |
| To: |
<hwg-basics(at)hwg.org> |
| References: |
hartcrowser |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Charles,
One thing I really liked about something you refer to. I completely agree
that WE need to keep the pressure on them to continually improve. Your
explanation was very good and probably actually a little more accurate than
was mine.
Thanks,
Keith D Sellars
WebGraffix
www.webgraffix.com
"Making database sites seem easy"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles A. Upsdell" <browser-news(at)upsdell.com>
To: <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
Cc: <Keith(at)webgraffix.com>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: CSS in IE 6
>
> >IE has always been more forgiving of coding errors as a rule than some of
> >the other browsers.
>
> True
>
> > Netscape, for instance, was less forgiving because it
> >more closely adhered to established standards.
>
> IE4 (and up) are more standards-compliant than NN4. If you study the
> standards carefully, you will find that IE4 implements HTML 4 and CSS 1
> far, far better than NN4. (e.g. IE4 supports 69% of CSS1, but NN4
supports
> only 33%). Which is not surprising inasmuch as NN4 came out before the
HTML
> 4 and CSS 1 standards were released (but is surprising inasmuch as
Netscape
> never bothered to fix this disparity).
>
> As to Netscape being less forgiving. The HTML standards do NOT specify
> what a browser should do if it encounters invalid code. They do not say
> that the browser should go berserk (as NN too often does), or that the
> browser should try to recover gracefully (as IE does), so neither
browser's
> reaction to invalid HTML is either right or wrong. As for CSS, its
> standards do require that the browser ignore what it cannot
> understand: NN4 violates this by (as before) often going berserk, and IE4
> violates this by trying to second-guess the coder, so neither browser's
> reaction to invalid CSS is right.
>
> All this is history, however. Both Mozilla and IE6 are very
> standards-compliant the DOCTYPE is set appropriately, and I would hesitate
> to say which is the leader ... except to comment that Mozilla is better at
> some things, IE6 at others, and both will get better if we keep up the
> pressure.
>
>
> -
> Chuck Upsdell, Website Design
> Email: chuck(at)upsdell.com
> Website: http://www.upsdell.com/
> Browser News: http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/
>
>
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.