OK, I gotcha now.  When looking at things in that light, I would probably
have to agree with you to a large extent.  Those ideas are more abstract
than what I have dealt with in the past several years, but ones that I am
gradually absorbing as I force myself to learn the mechanics that drive
html, css, accessibility, etc.

Thanks for the explanation - much appreciated.

Keith D Sellars
WebGraffix
www.webgraffix.com
"Making the Internet Easy"

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Annery Kiln Web Design" <info(at)annerykiln.co.uk>
To: "Keith D Sellars" <Keith(at)webgraffix.com>; <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 8:32 AM
Subject: Re[4]: Centering and Justifying


> > I'm not sure which standard you're validating against, but if you look
at:
>
> >
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.websitedatabasesolutions.com%2Ftemptest.htm
>
> > ... you will see that it DOES indeed validate against the HTML 4.01
> > transitional standard published by the W3C.
>
> Oh yes - no problem with 4.01 trans validation - I was gently and not
> aggressively pointing out that Zeldman et all would ragard it is not
> following Web Standards in terms of structural mark up and avoiding
> attributes that are better placed in CSS to allow btter cross-browser
> compatibility in to the future as well as back in to the past
> versions.
>
> Not a big deal but...
>
> Marten Gallagher
>
> -- 
> Annery Kiln Web Design
> Delivering Information Effectively
> www.annerykiln.co.uk
> Web Design and Site Management
> Web Hosting and Print Design
>
>
>
>
>
>

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA