Re: Critique request : pixelchurch

by "Rajnish Bhaskar" <r.bhaskar(at)compserv.gla.ac.uk>

 Date:  Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:41:13 +0100
 To:  "Andy Innes" <innax(at)icon.co.za>
 Cc:  hwg-critique(at)hwg.org
 In-Reply-To:  andy
  todo: View Thread, Original
> I'd appreciate a critique on www.pixelchurch.com
> 
> I'm busy writing a NN stylesheet, so Netscape users just get a
> redirect at the mo'

Your browser sniffer is a bit off, since it blocked Mozilla 1.1+ (the 
basis [more or less] of NN7) as well as NN4.x, which is what I 
suspect you were *actually* wanting to block.  Mozilla and it's 
children (Netscape 6.x and 7.x) have infinitely better CSS rendering 
than NN4.x.  In fact, if I turn off Javascript so that the redirect 
doesn't happen and look at the site, it looks exactly the same as it 
does in IE5.5.

HTH,
Raj.
-- 
Rajnish Bhaskar
r.bhaskar(at)compserv.gla.ac.uk, http://lordofthemoon.com
IT Education Unit, University of Glasgow
http://www.iteu.gla.ac.uk/
--
As far as Death was aware, the sole reason for any human association 
with
pigs and lambs was as a prelude to sausages and chops.  Quite why 
they should
dress up for children's wallpaper as well was a mystery.
	-- (Terry Pratchett, Hogfather)

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.