RE: Quality

I think the statement within context was referring to the off-the-shelf
purchases that most *users* acquire.

Very few build their machines, goof around reinstalling windows95, or buying
Sun machines.

Playing semantics certainly doesn't do anyone much good.  That's how
irrelevant threads get fuel.

Eric J Hoffman
Director of Internet Initiatives
Meagher & Geer, PLLP

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org [mailto:owner-hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org]On
> Behalf Of Peter Williams
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 1999 7:23 PM
> To: hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org
> Subject: RE: Quality
>
>
> I think you need to clarify
> "All new computer systems default to high at minimum..."
>
> If I take a new PC and install Windows 95 it will result
> in a 256 colour 640x480 display setting.
>
> If I take a new Sun Workstation and install Solaris 2.6 it
> will result in a very different set of display parameters.
>
> If I take a new...  I think you get the idea.
>
> Peter Williams
> LAN Support/Webmaster
> williams(at)hendersons.com.au
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org [mailto:owner-hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org]On
> > Behalf Of Eric J Hoffman
> > Subject: RE: Quality
> >
> >
> > All new computer systems default to high at minimum, plenty at
> true color
> > (24 bit).  The issue is, can you discount those users at 256,
> or create a
> > LOWSRC for each???
> >
>

HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA