Re: GIF - UNISYS issue
by "Andy Innes" <innax(at)icon.co.za>
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Oct 1999 22:51:38 +0200 |
To: |
"Darren Lampson" <dlampson555(at)home.com>, <hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
hwg LISAS4D66 home |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
That is my understanding of the issue. My worry is that if you use, say, Gif
Construction Set for moving gif89a's and they (GCS) are not licensed, you
pay $5000.00 one-off licensing fee per site. burnallgifs.org has a freeware
utility for converting gif to png and I am seriously considering going that
route, just to avoid being caught in the crossfire.
Unisys are changing their position on LZW all the time, but I think it
currently says that if you design a site which is commercial, you pay the
fee for gif usage if there is one gif or more on your site that was created
using software by a developer that that didn't pay UNISYS the LZW license
fee.
IT'S SCARY
Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: Darren Lampson <dlampson555(at)home.com>
To: <hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org>
Sent: jeudi 28 octobre 1999 19:23
Subject: GIF - UNISYS issue
> Just wondering how you feel about the gif - unisys patent issue and if you
> plan on doing anything about it (go to http://burnallgifs.org for
background
> info)? I personally have made the decision to keep using gifs until png
> becomes more widely supported in browsers. As far as I can tell, if you
> created your gifs with a program that has the proper licence (like
> Fireworks, Photoshop, etc.), you are fine. Is this what other's understand
> as well?
>
> Darren
>
>
HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA