Re: NS upgrade, more
by "Comharsa" <comharsa(at)clara.net>
|
Date: |
Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:50:17 -0000 |
To: |
<hwg-graphics(at)mail.hwg.org> |
References: |
autumnweb |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
From: "Roxy"
> Ohhhh, nooooo! Don't tell me!
>
> Can anyone get word to the testers/makers? Netscape is going to loose *at
> least* one more loyal, die-hard supporter IF it can't get the new version
> to QUIT DYING when it encounters code that it doesn't like! If they can't
> correct Netscape's *shudder of death* and subsequent lock up when
> encountering something it cannot understand - they will push MORE *getting
> tired of it* loyalists over to the other side permanently.
The thing with Mozilla/Netscape 5/6 whatever, is that it is going to be
standards compliant (at least much more so than the others). The problem is
not with HTML but with the javascript that some people are using for DHTML.
At the moment NS and IE use different ways of passing information (the
Document Object Model) in order for them to do things. Neither of these is
standard compliant. Mozilla will be, but that means for some DHTML to work
in all three browsers it will need very careful scripting.
So don't worry too much :-).
Brian
comharsa(at)clara.net
HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA