At 21:48 12-04-00 , David L. Semans wrote:
>Your answer was a wonderful illustration of how questions 
>should _not_ be answered on this list.

Might I infer, then, that yours is an example, rich with the best of which
you might have to offer, of cherished answers to the questions raised?

>For one, you never answered the question asked.

Might I infer, then, perhaps an ignorance of your part, to the relevance of
the methodology suggested?

>Two, your observations are just ridiculous.  It doesn't 
>really matter what convention the "Redmond Kids" use.  

Might I infer, then, an ignorance on your part, of the post-CERN history of
the Web, prior to Microsoft's standards-abusing entry (in the era prior to
www.microsoft.com being able to run under Windows), and in particular with
regard to the issues of usability and user confusion?

>Three, your long-standing, bitter attitude is a stench to me.  

Might I infer, then, that you might well benefit from the establishment of
a kill file in your mail reader?

Safe computing,  /Harold

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Harold A. Driscoll                 mailto:Harold(at)Driscoll.Chi.IL.US
#include <std/disclaimer>                 http://Driscoll.Chi.IL.US

HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA