Re: moving from unix to win2k
by "Timothy G. Embler" <hwg(at)myrealbox.com>
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Mar 2000 17:55:49 -0800 |
To: |
<hwg-servers(at)hwg.org>, "John Erjavec V" <jev(at)pconline.com> |
References: |
eastern pconline |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
LOL..its not my choice to get an NT machine but sometimes I cant stop it.
We did not have any problems but they "need" to use CF. We have tried CF on
ix and it just doesnt work like NT, I wish it did.
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Erjavec V" <jev(at)pconline.com>
To: "Timothy G. Embler" <hwg(at)myrealbox.com>; <hwg-servers(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: moving from unix to win2k
> At 03:33 PM 3/21/00 -0800, Timothy G. Embler wrote:
> >Hello. I have several websites on unix servers but I am now moving them
> >all
> >to a win2k colo. If this requires other software I can install it. I am
> >using htaccess for custom 404's and to password protect dir's. How can
> >this
> >be done on the new win machine?
>
> Well, Apache runs on WinNT and Win 98, so I would guess that it runs as
> well on Win2000. If that is what you are going to be using, then there
> should be very little, if any, change.
>
> Not to start any religious wars, but is there are reason you are taking a
> step back to the Windows machine? *g* If there's a problem, we might be
> able to help out with it.
>
> -JEV
> --
> John Erjavec V ## spammers-will-be-reported(at)jevonline.com
> ## http://www.jevonline.com/jev/index.html
> "I'll say it again for the logic impaired." --Larry Wall
>
>
HWG: hwg-servers mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA