RE: ActionScript vs. JavaScript

You must also consider that a lot of those people that have JavaScript
disabled are more than likely to have Flash disabled (as in no ActiveX
Objects etc.), in fact I would imagine there are more occurrences of =
this
than JavaScript being disabled (although I have no proof and would love =
to
here some stats). Don't get me wrong I love Flash but I'm constantly =
finding
more and more reasons that get in the way of making it really =
successful.

- Brett
=20

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org [mailto:owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org] =
On
Behalf Of Paul Roberts
Sent: Saturday, 12 April 2003 7:06 PM
To: hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org; beno
Subject: Re: ActionScript vs. JavaScript

i get 0.78% JS disabled for one of my sites against=20
thecounter's 9% for march 2003,=20
so i think it depends on your audience.

Best Wishes

Paul Roberts
hwg at paul-roberts dot com
++++++++++++++++++++++++
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "beno" <lists(at)TheWebsons.com>
To: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Cc: <alex.bainbridge(at)travelucd.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2003 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: ActionScript vs. JavaScript


Hi;
I forgot to follow this thread, so here' just the follow-up...

My source forJS stats:
http://www.thecounter.com/stats/
JS is disabled on 9% of browsers.
beno

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA