Re: ActionScript vs. JavaScript

by "Paul Roberts" <hwg(at)roberts200025.freeserve.co.uk>

 Date:  Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:06:16 +0100
 To:  <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>,
"beno" <lists(at)TheWebsons.com>
 References:  web
  todo: View Thread, Original
i get 0.78% JS disabled for one of my sites against=20
thecounter's 9% for march 2003,=20
so i think it depends on your audience.

Best Wishes

Paul Roberts
hwg at paul-roberts dot com
++++++++++++++++++++++++
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "beno" <lists(at)TheWebsons.com>
To: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Cc: <alex.bainbridge(at)travelucd.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2003 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: ActionScript vs. JavaScript


Hi;
I forgot to follow this thread, so here' just the follow-up...

My source forJS stats:
http://www.thecounter.com/stats/
JS is disabled on 9% of browsers.
beno

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA