Re: Reminder: HWG-Techniques' purpose...

by "Ben Russo" <i.am.ben(at)sympatico.ca>

 Date:  Fri, 20 Jul 2001 13:11:33 -0700
 To:  <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
 References:  com
  todo: View Thread, Original
Um.  Has anyone ever thought about the lame arguments that happen that
shouldn't be on this list?

Everyone is always bitching about what should be discussed and what
shouldn't be discussed.  Then there's a bunch of fights about it and the
list ends up getting hundreds of emails about this one little argument.

Even now, "Reminder:  HWG-Techniques' purpose..." is going to become one of
those arguments that goes on and on with people putting in their two cents
all the time.  Meanwhile, there's no place on the list for arguments.  I did
not join this list to debate 24/7 about what to talk about.

The NN versus IE discussion may or may not be a techniques subject.  I'm not
even going to add my opinion cause there's no point.  Some people will find
a good learning experience when comparing the two browsers.  Others will get
somewhat annoyed.  But hey, I'm sure we all get annoyed about people asking
the same questions over and over - yet that's all part of the list's
content.

I know for sure that nobody is gaining or giving any knowledge when you
fight about what belongs here.  And surprisingly enough, these arguments
make up half of my list mail.

So stop with these meaningless arguments because nobody is ever going to
agree.  And may I remind you that moderators DO monitor the list - let them
do their job.

- Ben

PS:  Yes, I said lame and meaningless.  That's my opinion.  Your opinion may
be the total opposite.  Please don't make that yet another argument on the
list.  Thanks!


----- Original Message -----
From: Kym Jones <kjones(at)adam.com.au>
To: Jim O'Brien <JObrien(at)witness.com>; <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: Reminder: HWG-Techniques' purpose...


>
>
>
> <snip>
> At 07:58 PM 19/07/2001 -0400, Jim O'Brien wrote:
> >And I quote....
> >
> >"This list is targeted toward those of you who are of intermediate to
> >advanced skill level. Its charter incorporates the issues of both "how to
do
> >it" and "why/when to do it" as they relate to website design and
creation. "
> >
> >Notice it doesn't say to use this board for ongoing debates about IE and
> >Netscape issues....
> >
> >Just trying to keep value in the groups....
> >
> >- "the Design Guy"
> </snip>
>
> Jim,
>
> So how is one supposed to discuss  "how to do it" and "why/when to do it"
> without taking into account the "the good, the bad and the ugly" of both
or
> all browsers ?  Surely the browsers are often at the core of many of the
> "issues".
>
> Granted, lengthy debates and flame wars about who likes what most are an
> interruption, but when they contain valuable information as to why
> something works better in one than in the other, IMHO they are both
> relevent and useful. When another little tidbit is added, often it will
> bring more into the discussion from someone who maybe was not involved
> because they had nothing to contribute.
>
> I for one have learned an enormous amount from this list in the...um..5
> years or so that I've been on it and if these posts are/were out of line,
I
> just know the list guides will pounce with great dexterity upon the
> offending poster.
>
> Kym
> She who has had her fingers smacked more than once.... :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Free Graphics for Personal Websites
> http://www.conceptualeyez.com
>
> E-Book Covers & Illustrating
> Samples, Covers and Sets.
> http://www.conceptualeyez.com/e-graphics/e-graphics.html
>
>
>
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.