I've never seen a published report where CF outperformed PHP, and I've
looked at half a dozen or so. Was that with a direct connection to the DB or
ODBC?

Data Driven Design
1506 Tuscaloosa Ave
Holly Hill, Florida 32117

http://www.datadrivendesign.com
Phone: (386) 226-8979

Websites That WORK For You
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Wilson" <mwilson(at)xionmedia.com>
To: "Data Driven Design" <jeff(at)datadrivendesign.com>; "tim booker"
<timbooker(at)btinternet.com>; "'Mike Kear'" <choicemag(at)hotmail.com>;
<klaas(at)gracegraphics.be>; <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 4:20 PM
Subject: RE: Coldfusion vs ... Oh dear!


> Hi,
>
> If performance is an issue then I don't see where
> >you'd have any choice. Run your own benchmarks and see for
> >yourself. There's
> >no way for PHP to lose.
>
> Tested PHP 4 ran about 45 pages a min on Linux... CF 5 ran about 75 pages
> per min on Win 2K.. of course CF 5 did better on Linux. Same data... same
> requests.
>
> Mike
>
>

• Web Designer Courses
• Off the Shelf Training Courses

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA