Re: DHTML & CSS update

by "Darrell King" <darrell(at)webctr.com>

 Date:  Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:08:33 -0400
 To:  <mkear(at)afpwebworks.com>,
<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
 References:  mainman
  todo: View Thread, Original
We are using XHTML 1.0 Strict and Transitional almost exclusively nowadays,
including CSS for all formatting and positioning.  It's working fine,
although it seems that we learn something else new twice a day!

D


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Kear" <mkear(at)afpwebworks.com>



I want to use CSS positioning and DHTML menus, which (I believe) means only
IE5+ and NN5+ and equivalent browsers will be able to see the site  - is
that right?  (if so I don't believe that will be a problem in terms of users
- the stats say they're less than 3% of my users)

Has anyone else made this move?  I'd like to know what your experiences were
- did the users object?  Get tangled up with complaints about inability to
access the site?   Did the users like it?  (It's very quick compared to
graphics-based rollovers etc)

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.