Re: DHTML & CSS update
by "Darrell King" <darrell(at)webctr.com>
|
| Date: |
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:08:33 -0400 |
| To: |
<mkear(at)afpwebworks.com>, <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
| References: |
mainman |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
We are using XHTML 1.0 Strict and Transitional almost exclusively nowadays,
including CSS for all formatting and positioning. It's working fine,
although it seems that we learn something else new twice a day!
D
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Kear" <mkear(at)afpwebworks.com>
I want to use CSS positioning and DHTML menus, which (I believe) means only
IE5+ and NN5+ and equivalent browsers will be able to see the site - is
that right? (if so I don't believe that will be a problem in terms of users
- the stats say they're less than 3% of my users)
Has anyone else made this move? I'd like to know what your experiences were
- did the users object? Get tangled up with complaints about inability to
access the site? Did the users like it? (It's very quick compared to
graphics-based rollovers etc)
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.