Re: (OT) reply to???
by =?iso-8859-1?Q?Josu=E9_Figueira_Machado?= <jmachado(at)mindspring.com>
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jun 2000 11:00:22 -0400 |
To: |
<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
hwg |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Rob,
It wasn't that hard removing your address from this reply ;-) In OE, you can
build a filter with the following rules:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
Where the To or CC line contains 'hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org'
Move it to Whatever folder
You can certainly improve filter. HTH,
Josu�
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Prentice" <RJP(at)clickdms.com>
To: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 5:36 AM
Subject: reply to???
> i use outlook at work. and when i try to reply to a post it comes up
> with the persons personal email address. why? why cant the email server
> that the posts go through set the reply to address as
> hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org like all the other lists im a member of? like the
> Director group. makes life easyer.
> because of this i dont bother to reply to posts. because ill forget to
> change the address im sending it to and i dont want to send replies to
> personal addresses. ive done it twice so far on this list. also, i dont
> bother sending any. because if i have to reply to someone who answered
> my post it my go private. and that is so annoying. also, the filters in
> outlook are a bit naff. i told it that every email with
> hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org anywhere in the header should be placed into
> another folder. it doesnt do it. why? ive tried to filter messages and
> it wont do it properly.
> who do i write to to get the 'reply to' thing sorted out? or atleast for
> the list server to do something with the header so outlook can
> understand what to do with it.
> is anyone else having this arsey problem with the reply to? or is it
> just me?
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA