Re: XHTML and Java

by "Steve Mount" <steve(at)saltyrain.com>

 Date:  Tue, 20 May 2003 13:52:49 -0400
 To:  "John Hornbuckle" <john.hornbuckle(at)taylor.k12.fl.us>,
<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
 References:  fl
  todo: View Thread, Original
Sometimes you just have to say "oh well."  If that's what you need to make
it work, and it works, and everything but *that* validates, then, oh well!

I see validation as a very useful tool, especially when I screw something up
that the validator finds for me.  But in this case, as in other similar
cases, you have done everything you can, and there seems to be no
alternative.  So don't kill yourself trying to fix something that isn't
broken.

-------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Mount, Software Engineer            steve(at)saltyrain.com
Home Site                            http://www.saltyrain.com
US Constitution Online          http://www.usconstitution.net

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Hornbuckle" <john.hornbuckle(at)taylor.k12.fl.us>
To: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 10:33 AM
Subject: RE: XHTML and Java


> But "code" isn't a valid parameter in XHTML 1.0 Strict or XHTML 1.1...
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.