RE: XHTML and Java

It's too early in the game for me to throw in the towel!

Something genuinely *is* broken, though. The "code" attribute is =
deprecated,
and anyone coding for the future should be moving away from it. There =
HAS to
be a working alternative--I just don't know what it is, being pretty
inexperienced with Java applets and strict coding.


John=20


-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Mount [mailto:steve(at)saltyrain.com]=20
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 1:53 PM
To: John Hornbuckle; hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org

Sometimes you just have to say "oh well."  If that's what you need to =
make
it work, and it works, and everything but *that* validates, then, oh =
well!

I see validation as a very useful tool, especially when I screw =
something up
that the validator finds for me.  But in this case, as in other similar
cases, you have done everything you can, and there seems to be no
alternative.  So don't kill yourself trying to fix something that isn't
broken.

-------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Mount, Software Engineer            steve(at)saltyrain.com
Home Site                            http://www.saltyrain.com
US Constitution Online          http://www.usconstitution.net

----- Original Message -----=20
From: "John Hornbuckle" <john.hornbuckle(at)taylor.k12.fl.us>
To: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 10:33 AM
Subject: RE: XHTML and Java


> But "code" isn't a valid parameter in XHTML 1.0 Strict or XHTML 1.1...
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA