RE: XHTML and Java

<object classid="java:applet_name.class" ... etc



On Tue, 2003-05-20 at 14:20, John Hornbuckle wrote:
> It's too early in the game for me to throw in the towel!
> 
> Something genuinely *is* broken, though. The "code" attribute is deprecated,
> and anyone coding for the future should be moving away from it. There HAS to
> be a working alternative--I just don't know what it is, being pretty
> inexperienced with Java applets and strict coding.
> 
> 
> John 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Mount [mailto:steve(at)saltyrain.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 1:53 PM
> To: John Hornbuckle; hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
> 
> Sometimes you just have to say "oh well."  If that's what you need to make
> it work, and it works, and everything but *that* validates, then, oh well!
> 
> I see validation as a very useful tool, especially when I screw something up
> that the validator finds for me.  But in this case, as in other similar
> cases, you have done everything you can, and there seems to be no
> alternative.  So don't kill yourself trying to fix something that isn't
> broken.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Steve Mount, Software Engineer            steve(at)saltyrain.com
> Home Site                            http://www.saltyrain.com
> US Constitution Online          http://www.usconstitution.net
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Hornbuckle" <john.hornbuckle(at)taylor.k12.fl.us>
> To: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 10:33 AM
> Subject: RE: XHTML and Java
> 
> 
> > But "code" isn't a valid parameter in XHTML 1.0 Strict or XHTML 1.1...
> >

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA