Re: Dreamweaver
by David Kendall <david(at)homepagesplus.com>
|
| Date: |
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:35:22 -0600 |
| To: |
jalal <the_jalal(at)fastmail.fm>, hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org |
| In-Reply-To: |
fastmail |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
> Does the latest Dreamweaver support relative positioning of div's?
This reminds me - I don't like the <div> tag too much, don't ask me
why, maybe because I never understood it. I usually use tables and
framesets for positioning. As an example, and to show you the
solution I found to the non tiling background" post of a few weeks
ago (which was ready a few weeks ago), my current client page
(under construction) http://www.homepagesplus.com/test/mike/ )
Is <div> better than framesets and tables? (I know, "better" is a
very subjective term). If so, using the WYSIWYG features of
Dreamweaver (and, I guess, repeating what Jalal already asked),
would it position my objects where I place them? (I do have the
newest version, Dreamweaver MX)
--
David Kendall - president / chief web designer
Home Pages Plus!
david(at)homepagesplus.com
www.homepagesplus.com
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.