RE: Image Slicer

by Rob Prentice <RJP(at)clickdms.com>

 Date:  Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:17:04 -0000
 To:  "'Freda Lockert'" <fredalockert(at)clara.co.uk>,
hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
  todo: View Thread, Original
I dont use image ready. I tried version 1 and hated it. I prefer fireworks.
I find that macromedia is better for Internetty things. Adobe is far better
for graphics. I usualy do everything in photoshop, then put it into
fireworks for the slicing.

But photoshop6's slicing is very poor. it isnt accurate. to get it to be
accurate you have to use guides, and you endup with a huge mess of blue
lines and mistakes are easy to make so you have to do it again.

maybe the new version of image ready is greatly improved and it works and
the flow is easyer to go with. but im used to fireworks now and so ill stick
with that rather than having to get to grips with a program that i dont need
to learn.

take care,
 Rob.

-----Original Message-----
From: Freda Lockert [mailto:fredalockert(at)clara.co.uk]
Sent: 06 December 2000 18:17
To: hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
Subject: RE: Image Slicer


>
>
>photoshop6 can slice too. but its pretty substandard at it. it isnt very
>accurate.
>

ImageReady 2 (bundled with Photoshop 5.5) slices with no problems 
(for me), is Photoshop 6 worse in some way?

Freda
-- 
Spaceship Earth: The problem for the passengers is that there is no 
manual to identify all the parts, and no instructions for the 
passengers on how to operate the spaceship. - Richard Buckminster 
Fuller. 

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.