RE: software text editors
by Klaas De Waele <klaas(at)gracegraphics.be>
|
| Date: |
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:43:26 +0100 |
| To: |
"'hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org'" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
>> I shiver when I have to clean up a concept page that was done in FP. It's
almost always faster for me to go from scratch than to decipher and clean up
the end result of FP after a standard user has played. FP is great for rip
and trash pages... but not for anything I'd put out for the long haul or
that needed speed.
-- I personally have used FrontPage many times to create pro websites, and
although it DOES require you to go to html view every now and then, and it
also requires you to know WHAT you are doing through your dragging, dropping
and pulling, I found it does quite a good job as long as you stay away from
the FrontPage-specific extensions other than form validation or the
"built-in" javascript. Inserting DIVs yourself is also required for
example, but once there and the style=absolute is set, you can also drag
them around.
It's just a matter of preference and which you find more annoying I guess.
I however would like for this discussion not to turn out similar to this
one:
Netscape doesn't crash 50% of the time
but Internet Explorer DOES crash 50% of the time
-> this is what personal taste means :D
- Kayjey -
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.