Re: New Topic WYSIWYG
by Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg(at)idyllmtn.com>
|
| Date: |
Sat, 05 Dec 1998 23:34:55 -0800 |
| To: |
Luke Opperman <luko(at)rocketmail.com> |
| Cc: |
hwg-theory <hwg-theory(at)hwg.org> |
| In-Reply-To: |
rocketmail |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 10:20 p.m. 12/05/98 -0800, Luke Opperman wrote:
>First, I was anti-editor all the way. [...]
>Then I used Dreamweaver. Here was an interesting gap in my
>reasoning. After fiddling with the preferences, I could
>see the HTML as I edited in the WYSIWYG part, I could
>write in HTML if I wanted, and I could not tell the
>difference.
This is the second time Dreamweaver's come up in this
thread -- how good is it on producing valid, and more
importantly (for me at least) accessible HTML code?
(Accessible as defined by the W3C's Web Accessibility
Initiative -- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ )
--Kynn
--
Kynn Bartlett <kynn(at)idyllmtn.com> http://www.idyllmtn.com/~kynn/
Chief Technologist & Co-Owner, Idyll Mountain Internet; Fullerton, California
Enroll now for web accessibility with HTML 4.0! http://www.hwg.org/classes/
The voice of the future? http://www.hwg.org/opcenter/w3c/voicebrowsers.html
HWG hwg-theory mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA