Re: Fairness of free scripts
by "Kathleen Anderson" <kathleen(at)spiderwebwoman.com>
|
Date: |
Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:38:03 -0400 |
To: |
<ben(at)thenetzone.co.uk>, <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
pc |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Hi Ben:
You need to change all the '&' to '&' (without the quotes) and then it
will validate. I had to do that with Barnes & Noble script and also Google,
I believe.
HTH,
~ Kathleen Anderson
Spider Web Woman Designs
mailto:kathleen(at)spiderwebwoman.com
http://www.spiderwebwoman.com/
AWARE Center Advisory Board Member
http://aware.hwg.org/
----- Original Message -----
From: Ben Bradley UK <bradley(at)mudmail.co.uk>
To: <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 5:07 PM
Subject: Fairness of free scripts
> I think it is extremely unfair the way some companies do not bother to
make
> sure their scripts validate before getting users to add them to their
pages.
>
> For example, on attempting to validate my site, there were only four
errors,
> and yes, they were all in scripts provided by companies!
>
> Has anyone else had any problems with this, and any success in getting
> companies to re-write their scripts?
>
> I have often found that the problems are within the paging systems said
> companies use.
>
> eg: this one came from CNET News.com Affiliate Button
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Line 433, column 76:
> ... ast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=1476905&siteid=10138169&bfpage=news_5"
TARGE
> ...
> ^
> Error: general entity "bfpage" not defined and no default entity
> ---------------------------------------
>
> This annoys me!!!!
>
> Any advice apart from getting rid of the offending items?
>
> Ben Bradley UK
> Creative Director
>
>
> INTERNET: http://www.thenetzone.co.uk
> EMAIL: enquiries(at)thenetzone.co.uk
> FAX: 07080 810966 (From UK)
> eFAX: 001 801 409 5638 (From UK)
> PHONE: 07941 120956 (From UK)
>
>
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA