Re: Candidates representing me

by Deborah Adelman <dadelman(at)q-com.com>

Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 1998 18:24:58 -0600
To:	Ann Navarro <ann(at)webgeek.com>, Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg(at)idyllmtn.com>
Cc:	hwg-elections(at)mail.hwg.org
References:	com idyllmtn com2 idyllmtn2 com3
	todo: View Thread, Original

At 03:58 PM 1/12/98 -0800, Ann Navarro wrote:
>Just because you want the GB to be representational DOES NOT mean
>that it becomes so, nor should it become so. 

Come on, Ann! Where on God's green earth do you see that I want that
anywhere in what I said. Will you get real please? (Yes, that was rude, but
I am tired on having what I said misquoted & thrown back at me.)

>Nobody said we didn't. But Deborah, if you post complaining about a
>personal statement of a member, you must be prepared to have that >opinion
challenged. 

I am prepared. And don't mind the message. I mind the TONE of it. I do NOT
like to be called or have my opinions or ideas called stupid or dumb. I
seriously doubt you do either.

>Your responses since suggest that you only want to be able to
>complain, and not have anyone respond negatively to it. 

Again you chose to misread what is written. You may disagree all you like.
I object to being flamed for my opinion. I don't do it to you & I don't
want it done. Are you misreading what I wrote on purpose? It appears so to me.

>That's not how it works. 

No, it isn't. And I, again, don't mind that anyone disagrees. I DO mind
that I or my beliefs are attacked. 

And this is really not worth it. I would prefer to get back to the election
& drop this thread, unless someone wants to comment on it in a nonattacking
manner? That is certainly not hard to do. Like: Why you disagree. Not: You
have a stupid idea & are wrong. That is NOT disagreement. THAT is flaming &
nonproductive.

Deborah

HWG: hwg-elections mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA